
- Credit Default Swaps
- By Byron A. Ellis-November 01, 2008
A credit default swap (CDS) is,
basically, an unregulated financial insurance whereby the buyer makes
periodic payments to the seller in exchange for the right to a payoff if
there is a default or credit event in respect of a third party or reference
entity. Its original purpose was to transfer credit exposure from holders of
a fixed income security to the financial firm that sold the CDS. However,
over time it morphed into a betting game.
Thus, instead of insuring the
owner’s security from default risk, banks and hedge funds allowed
individuals without securities to buy insurance against securities that they
did not own.
The process is akin to owning a home
and insuring it with the ABC insurance company against unforeseen adverse
events. And, the ABC insurance company to increase its profits allows others
to buy insurance against your home without owning it.
Say, an investor bought a bond for a
billion dollars and pays 2 percent per year for insurance to a hedge fund.
The hedge fund makes a cool $20 million per year. But, in order to boots
revenues, it sells additional insurance against the investor’s bond, say to
another 20 individuals; now, its yearly revenue increased from betting on
that single bond to $420 million.
However, if the seller of the bond
defaults, the hedge fund has to pay out $21 billion dollars; so, the hedge
fund hedges the bets by purchasing insurance for an equal amount owed money,
$21 billion.
Ultimately someone is liable for the
$21 billion dollars. Yet, the scope of the liability is not known.
Therefore, any financial institution could be liable for billions of dollars
in CDS. And, it is this uncertainty that creates the credit crunch.
The Depository Trust Trading Corp.,
(DTTC) has registered more than $47 trillion of CDS; roughly twice the size
of the U.S. stock market and far in excess of the $7 trillion mortgage
market. Some analysts believe that the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers was
tied to about $400 million in CDS.
A board of members controls the DTTC,
which includes JPMorgan Chase & Co., Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and other
dealers that created and controlled trading in the credit-default swap
market.
Thus, for former members of the
Goldman Sachs Group to have advocated for a taxpayers’ money to bailout and
to be in charge of managing the distribution of bailout funds to financial
institutions is a travesty and a great conflict of interest.
Furthermore, it is callous to
deflect blame for the economic crisis on the sub prime mortgages; such
deflection was a deliberate red herring.
The sub prime market is no more than
14 percent of the mortgage market. Thus, it is clear that the credit crisis
is not a sub prime problem. Rather, it is a problem created by banks and
brokerage firms and it is not related to the so-called “easy credit.”
For the new administration to
establish credibility, it must immediately disassociate itself from the
conflict of interest associated with the former Goldman Sachs personnel.
[
Home |
Comments |
Search |
Post
]
POST COMMENT