
Clintonian Dissonance
By Byron A. Ellis,
March 29, 2008
The Clintonian dissonance is
potentially destructive to the Democratic Party. Dissonance occurs when a
cognitive element is not expected to follow from another. An element is a
belief, opinion, attitude, or knowledge about something. Any two cognitive
elements can be irrelevant (nothing in common), consonant (consistent) or
dissonant (inconsistent). For example, if you think that smoking is harmful
to your health, you would probable not smoke. However, what is consonant or
dissonant for one person may not be for another.
Thus, the Clintons may not recognize
that they have lost the race for the Democratic nomination and that
continuing to run causes harm to the Democratic Party. However, most
Democrats, and even Republicans, are aware that Hillary will not be the
Democratic nominee.
Dissonance is an aversive
motivational state, where the opposite of one element follows from the
other. It is a state where the individual knows that doing certain act is
damaging, but continues to do it. The Clintons know, or should know, that
they cannot overtake Obama’s lead in pledged delegates and that the longer
they stay in the race the more damage they inflict on themselves and on the
Democratic Party. So why are they still in the race?
Of course, they may believe that
staying in the race makes Hillary looks like a fighter and makes their
constituency feels good, as well as that staying in the race is expensive
and damaging to the Party. However, their dissonance is predicated on two
sets of cognitions, one consonant with the race for the nomination (looks
like a fighter and feels good) and the other dissonant (expensive and
damaging).
The importance of these two
cognitive clusters of elements determines dissonance. Thus, how much
dissonance the Clintons are experiencing depends on the relative size of
these two clusters. If the Clintons do not place any importance on the
Democratic Party winning the presidential nomination in November, they may
not be experiencing any dissonance. And, their temperament to distort
reality may, indeed, shield them from the tensions of a dissonance
experience.
Therefore, it is important for the
superdelegates to diminish the consonant cognitions that the Clintons
erroneously hold and increase their dissonant cognitions. Thus, by changing
the relative proportion of consonants and dissonant elements, they will
reduce the importance of the Clintons consonant elements, creating tensions
and stress that creates pressure to change within the Clintonian bubble.
Consistency is an important
organizational principle in cognitive processing. Sadly, although, many
Democrats yearned for Clintonian consistency, the Clintons failed to
deliver. Rather, they opted to reduce their dissonance by distorting or
misrepresenting information (i.e., NAFTA, Bosnia, Ireland, patriotism,
experience, race, and so on).
Although the window is closing, it
is not too late, for Mrs. Clinton to exit the race for the Democratic
nomination with grace.
[
Home | Comments |
Search |
Post
]
POST COMMENT