|
TJP |
THE JETHRO PROJECT |
||||||||||||
|
O R G A N I Z I N G F O R E F F I C I E N T O U T P U T |
|||||||||||||
|
|
The price driven demand narrative, more often than not, is a bogus explanation used by government officials and pundits to calm public anger. Higher energy price leads to real transfer of wealth from consumers to Big Oil, as reflected in Big Oil's windfall 2011 first quarter profit. Conoco-Phillips 2011 first quarter profit was $3 billion, $900 million higher than the first quarter of 2010; Exxon-Mobil net income was $11 billion; Shell’s profit was $9 billion, 60 percent higher than 2010; and Chevron’s profit was $6.2 billion, up from $4.4 billion in 2010. This price gouging pattern is similar to the one highlighted by Ellis in 2006 that reallocated consumers’ budgetary outlays from housing, entertainment, food and other necessities to energy. Such reallocations disrupt markets and often lead to economic slowdowns and unemployment. Ellis in his 2008 article on “Crude oil price: Shortage or speculation?” indicated that there are two ways to reverse the rise in crude oil prices: The first is terminating the wars in the Middle East and stabilizing the crude oil producing regions, and the second is suspending futures trading for crude oil on the NYMEX when there is instability in crude oil producing regions and letting producers set prices. It is, however, appalling that Congress and the administration, Republicans and Democrats alike, allow Big Oil to repeatedly gouge consumers. And, to tap it off, legislators use scarce government revenues to provide drilling subsidies to Big Oil. If the current crop of politicians are incapable of defending the economic interest of voters and the nation, them voters must choose a third political party that will defend their interest and not allow Big Oil to wreck the fragile economy. Post Comment |