
Expansionary Economic Policies
Leads to Adverse Consequences
By Byron A. Ellis
February 08, 2008
Policy makers have determined that
monetary and fiscal expansion is needed to avoid an economic downturn. They
know from economic theory that expanding the money supply and providing
transfers to tax payers increases aggregate demand. However, economic theory,
and history, also indicates that such expansionary policies always lead to
inflationary pressures, output reduction, and unemployment.
The slowing economy caught the
Federal Reserve and the Bush administration off guard. Thus, to provide a
short-term remedy, they continue to ignore the adverse influence of rising
energy prices. As a result, they prescribed monetization and government
transfers to boost aggregate demand.
Artificially boosting aggregate
demand does not solve the structural problems plaguing the economy, rising
energy prices. In the long run, expansionary policy is likely to compound
the economic problem, since the demand for goods and services will increase
due to the expansionary policy and the supply of goods and service will
decrease due to the raising energy prices.
The result, as depicted in the
figure below, will be a temporary increase in output (income) to Y1,
resulting from the increase in demand, and an increase in inflation from P0
to P1 followed by a contraction in output, say back to Y0,
resulting from higher energy prices, with inflation rising from P1
to P2. Furthermore, as inflation rises, the Fed will increase
interest rate and restrict the money supply in an effort to diminish
aggregate demand.

Failure of the Feds and the
Administration to acknowledge that rising energy prices are the principal
reason for the economic slowdown leads to misdiagnosis of the economic
problem, and hence incorrect remedies.
The Feds and the administration
identified the crisis in the sub-prime market as the reason for the economic
slowdown. However, the crisis in the sub-prime market is a symptom of the
economic problem; it is not the cause. The reason why potential homeowners
cannot pay they mortgages is because rising energy prices reduced their
disposable income.
The price of energy doubled since
2003 and it has caused increases in virtually all goods and services. Thus,
the mortgage portion of many homeowners income has to be allocated to more
expensive food and transportation, reducing their ability to pay their
mortgages.
The economy’s structural problems
can be corrected by implementing mechanisms that reduces the cost of energy,
particularly high oil prices. Thus, stabilizing Iraq and lowering the Iran
rhetoric would be helpful.
[
Home | Comments |
Search |
Post
]
POST COMMENT