
McCain’s Comment on Iran
is Similar to Ahmadinejad’s on Israel
Byron A. Ellis
It was interesting for
voters to have the opportunity to hear Senator John McCain’s comment on
bombing Iran. His comment was reminiscence of
Ahmadinejad's position on Israel. And, the civilized world deplored
Ahmadinejad’s position on Israel.
Will President McCain preemptively invade Iran?
Apparently, he has given the voters a view of his predisposition. So, will
voters continue to choose leaders that advocate war over peace?
The Senator’s spokesman
indicated that the McCain was being humorous. However, such humor is
unbecoming of respectable leaders and conveys inappropriate signals to
voters and the rest of the world.
However, McCain defended
is so called humor by telling critics to lighten up and get a life. Thus, he
appeared unwilling to accept that his comment on bombing Iran was
inappropriate.
The problem with many that
aspire to lead is that they are not willing to acknowledge errors. To
advocate bombing away at a sovereign country, whether in jest or not, is not
humorous; it is savagery.
Civilized societies must
find non-violent means to solve differences. If we look back at wars fought,
we find that even in victory, the gains are elusive.
Moreover, violence only
begets more violence; we clearly can see that in the misguided pre-emptive
attack on Iraq and Lebanon.
It is therefore incumbent
on Americans to use their intellect and not bombs to solve differences with
the rest of the world.
Send comments to:
tjp@jethroproject.com