
What if Virginia Tech had a Good
Emergency Response Plan?
Byron A. Ellis
What if Virginia Tech
administrators had a viable emergency response plan? Would the outcome be
different?
First, lets look at how a
household would react to a similar incident. If a normal household learned
that a murder occurred in their basement or elsewhere in the house. Members
of the household would check and notify other family members (head
count/communication), call the authorities, make sure the perpetrator is not
in the house, secure the premise, be on the look out, notify neighbors, and
so on. In other words, they would ensure that they, and neighbors, are
protected in the event that the perpetrator returns.
Now, lets look at the
actions of Virginia Tech administrators. They inspected the crime scene and
cordoned it off, detained a person of interest and held a meeting. However,
apparently they failed to provide timely notification to students and staff,
and to secure the premises.
Their justification for
not securing the premises and providing their stakeholders with timely
notification is that it was difficult to lockdown 100 or so buildings and
that cell phones and emails were difficult communications methods. However,
a strong police presence subsequent to the incident would have, in all
likelihood, secured the campus. Additionally, the administration should have
known that communication is the glue that binds efficient institutions and
the leadership should have been aware that pre-planning is a key component
of any emergency response plan.
Therefore, it does not
appear that Virginia Tech administrators had a viable emergency response
plan. How could they, when they had no effective way of communicating the
incident with their customers (the students) and employees (the staff) or a
plan to secure the campus?
Emergency preparedness
ought not to be complex; it should rely on simple robust steps, including
drills, to counter potential threats. For instance, institutions that have
emergency response programs and execute emergency drills become aware of
ineffective procedures. Thus, the purpose of drills is to assess the
effectiveness of evacuating buildings, responding to injuries, communicating
with stakeholders, and so on.
A well-executed emergency
drill would have revealed before the incident the ineffectiveness of
Virginia Tech communication systems. Thus, providing the administrators with
the opportunity to implement viable solutions. Some proven communication
systems are two-way radios, hard-wired or remote paging systems (loud
speakers), and using the university police officers to physically drive to
each building and notify occupants.
So, the excuse that
communication was difficult and complex and it was not possible to secure
the campus appears hollow. Sadly, what appeared to be missing was
forethought.
Send comments to:
tjp@jethroproject.com