
- The Danger of Excessive Stimulus
- By Byron A. Ellis-November 26, 2008
Finally, it appears that the Federal Reserve is
beginning to understand how it can restore the economy. On Tuesday, the
Federal Reserve Board announced the creation of the Term Asset-Backed
Securities Loan Facility (TALF), a facility that will help market
participants meet the credit needs of households and small businesses by
supporting the issuance of asset-backed securities (ABS) collateralized by
student loans, auto loans, credit card loans, and loans guaranteed by the
Small Business Administration (SBA).
Such action should have been initiated months ago.
However, the Federal Reserve, as well as the Treasury Department, failed to
understand the drivers of the economy and focused instead on aiding Wall
Street.
Gross domestic product, however, is driven by personal
consumption. Therefore, to restart the economy Treasury and the Fed must
facilitate consumption spending.
According to the Fed
press release, under the
TALF, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (FRBNY) will lend up to
$200 billion on a non-recourse basis to holders of certain AAA-rated ABS
backed by newly and recently originated consumer and small business loans.
The FRBNY will lend an amount equal to the market value of the ABS less a
haircut and will be secured at all times by the ABS. The U.S. Treasury
Department--under the Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP) of the Emergency
Economic Stabilization Act of 2008--will provide $20 billion of credit
protection to the FRBNY in connection with the TALF. The attached terms and
conditions document describes the basic terms and operational details of the
facility. The terms and conditions are subject to change based on
discussions with market participants in the coming weeks.
Ellis from The Jethro Project has consistently called for the use of
monetary policy to expand aggregate demand. Moreover, he has recently
indicated that government policy makers should be cognizant of the ongoing
stimulus resulting from lower energy prices.
The current stimulus due to lower gasoline prices could
be as high as $900 billion dollars, if we assume that motorists save an
average of $35 or more per fill up. The average small vehicle saves
approximately $20 per fill up and the average SUV about $50
{($50+$20)/2=$35}. The $35 savings does not account for savings from trucks
and larger vehicles.
Therefore, an average fill up of 2 tanks per week for
251,000,000 (BTS)
American motorists would lead to a yearly aggregate stimulus (due to
lower gasoline price) of about (=$35 x 2 fill ups x 52 weeks x 251,000,000
vehicles on the road) $914 billion. And, if the multiplier effect
{1/[1 0.80(1 0.20) = 2.78} is
accounted for, the stimulus could add more than
{$914 billion x 2.78 =} $2.5 trillion
dollars to the U.S. national income.
Additionally, lower energy
prices will cause the prices of other commodities to decrease, such as food,
gas surcharges, and so on. Hence, it is important to understand the
potential danger of using fiscal policy to over stimulate the economy.
The danger of over
stimulation is inflation, which would cause the Fed to increase interest
rates in order to reduce inflation. Higher interest rates would slow the
economy and lead higher levels of unemployment.
The new administration
must be mindful of this potential danger, and the economic cycle of boom and
bust.
[
Home |
Comments |
Search |
Post
]
POST COMMENT