Staying in Iraq: Fool’s Pride?
By Byron A. Ellis –
June 09, 2008
McCain is right; the major issue of
the 2008 election is Iraq, because the invasion of Iraq is inextricable
linked to higher crude oil prices and thus, it is a major contributor to the
adverse performance of the US economy.
As long as crude oil futures are
operational, gas price hikes will only subside when the conflict in Iraq has
been stabilized.
However, unlike the previous
election, voters today are fully aware of the impact the Iraq invasion has
on their personal income.
McCain acknowledged that he has
little understanding of economics. As a result, he perceives Iraq in terms
of American pride, winning or loosing the war.
Most Americans, however, perceive
the invasion as a deception; a monumental blunder which has adversely
affected their personal budget. They recognize that a higher percentage of
their budgetary outlays are now allocated to gasoline consumption. Moreover,
that the cost of other household necessities have also risen as a result of
crude oil increases.
Therefore, McCain’s position on
staying the course in Iraq is untenable. Staying the course in Iraq will
lead to higher crude oil prices and, eventually, a collapse of the US and
world economy.
It is ironic that the inappropriate
response to 9-11 has set in motion adverse economic forces that are likely
to cripple the US economy.
Last Friday, Israel’s prime
minister, Ehud Olmert, indicated that Israel and the US (meaning the Bush
administration) are of one mind over the possibility of military
intervention against Tehran’s nuclear program. As a result, crude oil
traders bid up the price of crude by approximately $10.00 per barrel; some
would want the public to believe that the rise was due to demand exceeding
supply.
The Republicans, the Bush
administration and refinery executives have tried their best to decouple the
rise in crude oil prices from regional instability induced by the Iraq
invasion. And, as long as they misidentify the root cause of the crude oil
price hikes, they will not be able to reverse the rise in prices.
One can assume that either they are
clueless, or they understand the consequences of higher crude oil prices,
but pride constrains them identifying the true cause and implementing
correct solutions. The latter appears to be the case, since McCain and the
administration often repeat the pride in victory mantra.
Clearly, though if the cost of
pride, staying in Iraq, raises the price of crude oil above $150 per barrel,
it is fool’s pride.
[
Home | Comments |
Search |
Post
]
POST COMMENT