O R G A N I Z
I N G F O R E F F I C I E N T O U T P U T
US Actions in Nicaragua Speak Louder than Words
By Byron A. Ellis –
June 15, 2009
It is interesting to observe how the
United States government uses assistance funds to mold behaviors in Central
America. According to
La Nacion, the US, this week, stopped poverty funding of $62 million
dollars to Nicaragua. The funds were allocated to assist in social projects
and to combat poverty. In contrast, the US treatment of military funds to
allies in the Middle East would never be cut due to disagreements. It is,
however, this unequal treatment between social and military funding that
creates uneasiness and mistrust of US foreign policies.
Many Nicaraguans want the Ortega
administration to retaliate by expulsing the US ambassador from Nicaragua.
It is expected, however, that funds from Alba would cover the real need for
social assistance and to combat poverty in Nicaragua.
It would seem that using a social
assistance and poverty fund as a weapon to influence internal Nicaraguan
politics is counterproductive. And, it will create room for countries such
as Venezuela, China, and Iran to build stronger relationships with Latin
American countries that will eventually inhibits the role and influence of
the US in the hemisphere and the world.
Both China and Iran are creating
inroads in Africa, as well as in Latin America. The US big stick approach is
seldom successful and makes a mockery of the new policy of change. It also
tends to validate the Republican position that change is an empty and over
used rhetoric.
Nicaragua has said that they have
documented the many instances of the US political secretary and the US
ambassador, Mr. Callahan, of meddling in Nicaragua’s internal politics.
The US should be focusing on gaining
the hearts and minds of the Nicaraguan people in spite of disagreements with
the Nicaraguan government; $62 million dollars is a small investment for
fighting poverty, when compared to the billions of dollars invested in
military aid to pop up repressive Middle East allies.
US foreign social funding uplifts
people and creates lasting friendships. Conversely, US military aid is often
used to oppress and annihilate people; it creates lasting enemies and
vindictiveness. Thus, preference of social funding to bridge differences
appears to be the optimum choice.
China by masterfully practicing
social funding, equitable economic exchange, and non-interference in the
host countries affair has made significant inroads across the globe. They
are sowing the seeds for sources of raw material and markets for their
products.
Alleviating poverty in Nicaragua and
across the globe is a plus for the United States; and it will help dislodge
the intrusion of fierce economic competitors from world markets. Therefore,
the Obama administration should consider restoring the poverty fund to the
Nicaraguan people.