
Subsidizing the Rich
Byron A. Ellis
December 15, 2007
When the U.S. government provides
subsidy to the poor there is always a negative connotation; critics label
them as lazy and undeserving. However, when subsidies are given to the
middle class, the rich, and foreign government there is no negative
connotation; every year the U.S. government provides large subsidies to
Israel, Pakistan, and Egypt.
The $286 billion farm bill, passed
by the Senate on a 79-14 vote, subsidizes oat, barley, soybeans, wheat, and
other crops; it even creates new grants for vegetable and fruit growers.
A farm subsidy is basically
financial aid, taxpayers’ money, which legislators provide to farmers. It
acts like a reduction in input price for the subsidized crops. Thus,
providing extra income to farmers.
Fairness requires that Congress also
provide a central city bill, where inner city businesses, education, and
housing are provided with subsidies equal to the farm bill funding. And,
they should start by immediately subsidizing housing for Katrina’s homeless.
The central city subsidy bill would
reduce the cost of operating inner city businesses, and the price of
education and housing to distressed residents.
The question to Congress is why
should rich farmers receive more subsidies than the poor and homeless. It
appears from the current redistribution of tax revenues that the policy of
Congress is to ignore distressed communities.
[
Home | Comments |
Search |
Post
]
POST COMMENT