
The Failure of Western Procedural
Justice
By Byron A. Ellis-August
18, 2008
The phrase “territorial integrity”
has become a rallying cry for Western leaders regarding the breakaway
Georgian provinces. It is, however, ironic that the West did not use such a
term for Kosovo when it declared independence from Serbia. The term was not
used when the West invaded Iraq, nor when Israel invaded Lebanon or when it
bombed Syria. So, why is territorial integrity applicable to Georgia and not
to other nations?
Territorial integrity is applicable
to Georgia because it is considered a friend of the West. Serbia, Iraq,
Hezbollah’s Lebanon, and Palestine are not considered friends of the West,
therefore territorial integrity in these regions are not relevant to Western
leaders.
This Western worldview is
inappropriate and, if not modified, will continue to produce adverse
consequences. The West and the rest of the world should adhere to the
concept of procedural justice.
Procedural justice is the
fairness of the decision-making process. It involves adherence to the
following rules of fairness: consistency, bias suppression, accuracy,
representation, correctability, and ethicality. It is the notion that
fair procedures guarantee fair outcomes.
Fair procedures are consistent.
Therefore, if territorial integrity is a core value, then it should be
applicable to all nations, friends and foe alike. Likewise, if the Russian
invasion of Georgia is wrong, then so are the Georgian invasion of South
Ossetia, the Israeli invasion of Lebanon, and the West invasion of Iraq.
Judgmental procedures should be
impartial. In other words, bias towards one side or the other should be
suppressed. For instance, in the case of Georgia and the Russia, there
should be a clear acknowledgement that Georgia precipitated the conflict.
Likewise, that Russia’s response was excessive and inappropriate.
Procedural justice requires
information accuracy and not spins. Spinning information may result in short
term gains, but over time it diminishes credibility. Procedural justice also
requires involvement of the affected parties in the decision-making process.
That is, they should have voice and representation and they should not be
demonized because they view of the world is different.
If we substitute Iraq for Georgia,
when the administration argues in favor of Georgia’s territorial integrity,
we see the hollowness and hypocrisy of their argument. It is this hypocrisy
that has diminished U.S. credibility and moral standing.
Additionally, the tendency of
Westerners to define others as evil is in itself demonic, because we are not
the judge of our sisters and brothers. The judge is perfect and the only one
that is good.
Procedural justice involves
correctability. That is, there should be a procedure to tweaked the system
back into balance. However, such a system can only exist if world powers
refrain from encroaching on the sovereignty of nations. And, we can achieve
this by establishing and agreeing to a few basic world rights such as
freedom to worship, full rights for women, sovereignty of all nations, the
elimination of weapons of mass destruction, free trade, the return of
occupied territories or just compensation for them, and so on.
Finally procedural justice involves
ethicality, which is a rule or habit of conduct with regard to right and
wrong. When we compromise our ethics, it is difficult to ask others not to
do likewise. For instance, when the West invades sovereign nations,
encourages regions such as Kosovo to become independent, but then proceed to
claim that other nations should respect sovereignty and should not seek
independence, it demonstrates its convoluted ethics.
Clearly, the Western response to the
conflict in Georgia is incongruous and hypocritical. And, it validates to
the world the lack of procedural justice inherent in Western worldview,
particularly toward the non-westerners.
Furthermore, listening and reading
the Western press and politicians, one would conclude that Georgia is an
innocent victim. Thus, both the Western press and leaders failed the
procedural justice test.
[
Home | Comments |
Search |
Post
]
POST COMMENT